To those that don’t listen to the (scientific) reasons behind tanning, Mr. For example, the fact that not manufacturing “fake leather†would actually be good for the environment and could mean a negative impact on the cheese and meat segmentsâ€. This translates into wrong beliefs – states Steve Sothmann, president of LHCA (The Leather & Hide Council of America). €œThe more the populations become urbanized, the less they understand agricultural dynamics. Furthermore, all US landfills, says the report, will likely be full in 4 years. Without tanning, 33 million hides would need to be burned or put in landfills, with a consequent additional 750,000 tons of CO2 being emitted every year. Without tanningĪs of today, says the study, tanning is to be thanked for the recovery of 85% of bovine hides that are currently produced in the United States. Only thing that could be achieved from an action such as this, considering a lively livestock industry, is that of ruining a solid circular economy mechanism. This report thus answers to those that think of hitting livestock farms by eliminating leather from fashion and design. The numbers related to bovines are, on the other hand, nearly unvaried. What emerges is that the raw hides’ market has experienced alternating results. The study analyzed the relation between the livestock industry and the tanning segment for the last 25 years. Brester – and they don’t directly influence the US cattle industryâ€.Ĭonversely, if the tanning industry was to disappear (as many hope), the system would be left to face “an environmental problemâ€, because raw hides would go from byproduct to waste. “Hides are one of many byproducts that result from processing cattle – comments Mr. Analyzing the data from the US meat and leather industries for the past 25 years, the researchers concluded that the market trends of the former were not influenced by those of the latter. Brester (emeritus professor of Agricultural Economics at Montana State University) and Kole Swanser, agricultural economist. This is confirmed, again, by the study conducted by Gary W. And they would either end up in landfills or burnt to produce electricity. Without tanning’s upcycling activities, hides would be reduced to a waste product created by the livestock industry. A claim that, surprisingly, still has pull among the operators of the fashion segment. This is a statement dear to the veg believers. To not use leather so that animals won’t be slaughtered.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |